Card Of The Week | |
10> | | Guest Guest
| Subject: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:50 am | |
| Testee's name: B@TMAN
Testee's deck: Shaddoll Artifacts
Tester's name: EbilKid
Tester's deck: Madolches
Duel results: 10/20
Ruling : 6/10
Flexibility: 3/5
You were able to adapt many parts on the duel and you were able to adapt hard situations. Your deck was able to counter most of my tricks especially in game 2. In both game 1 and 3, I didn't see much of you. With a few cards, I beat you. However, in both games 2 and 3, you were great and you were able to adapt in most of the situations. You may have not been able to do anything in game 1 due to dead draws.
Control of Duel: 3/5
The control of the duel was changed between both of us most of the time. The control you had was mostly in game 2. In game 1, you didn't have control at all over the game. I was able to dominate things quickly. In game 3, you were countering me a lot like game 2, but at one point, things stopped and I was able to win by one monster.
Deck Build: 33/40
Looking at your deck build, I believe that the build itself is fine and ok. It worked and preformed well during our duels. But I'd like to hint things out. Starting with the non very important, I believe you should cut your deck 40, but it isn't that important seeing that you have 41 cards. I believe you should add something like "Allure of Darkness" to the deck which can help you against the dead draws which you had at times and especially at game 1. Remove one Squamata and add one more Mathematician. Remove the two mystical space typhoons and add three "Artifact Ignition", and remove one "The Monarchs StormForth". However, your deck is good and you were able to play competitively in the games. Well done and good job.
Competitiveness: 8/10 Synergy: 8/10 Utilization of play style: 17/20
Siding Skills: 4/10
Your siding skills are not so good. Lava Golem, Prohibition, and Time Space Hole should all be removed from your side deck. I believe you should add De Fusion, one more Mystical Space Typhoon and "Flying" C. With putting the removed "The Monarches Storm Forth" from your main to your side. Looking at what you have sided against me, siding Maxx C, Stygian and Time space was clever against me. As they were your best options. Siding Prohibition wasn't really needed as I find it a useless card in the side deck. Also, you could have sided "D.D Crow" against me which could have been a great threat to my Hootcake and its effect. Siding out both Break Through Skill was a bit weird seeing that my deck all depends on the effects of the monsters.
Attitude: 5/5
Very nice guy. Pretty cool attitude.
Concentration: 4/5
Didn't realize that my Fire Hand was special summoned. When it attacked El Shaddoll Construct, he forgot and thought that I'd lose 1200 damage.
Misplays: ?/?
No misplays. No points dropped.
Total Score: 68/100
Lightsworn White: 91 - 100 Spellbook Green: 70 - 90 Gravekeeper Brown: 69 or lower.
You were so close to SpellBook Green. I think that it is your side deck which put you away from it. I am pretty sure that soon enough, you'll be SpellBook Green. You're a good and tough duelist. Good luck in your future retest. ^^
|
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:35 pm | |
| - Quote :
- Your siding skills are not so good. Lava Golem, Prohibition, and Time Space Hole should all be removed from your side deck. I believe you should add De Fusion, one more Mystical Space Typhoon and "Flying" C. With putting the removed "The Monarches Storm Forth" from your main to your side. Looking at what you have sided against me, siding Maxx C, Stygian and Time space was clever against me. As they were your best options. Siding Prohibition wasn't really needed as I find it a useless card in the side deck. Also, you could have sided "D.D Crow" against me which could have been a great threat to my Hootcake and its effect. Siding out both Break Through Skill was a bit weird seeing that my deck all depends on the effects of the monsters.
i would like to defend my choices for my side deck prohibtion: good against side decks that wreck shaddolls such as shadow mirrors or light of intervention or a card that my opponennt is using that could prevent him from doing further moves. it also stops some combos that some decks need to use such as burning abyss destroying themselves to trigger their effects. was going to use vs jelly and hootcake or your field spell depending on the situation. de-fusion-don't see the point since i wasn't excepting shaddoll since i know you aren't allowed to and felt putting it in would be a waste for this test lava golem- good against lockdown field and trigging my opponent cards just so they don't lose life points breakthrough skill was take out because it wont negate your monsters effects in the grave but only face up effects, d.d crow-because i didn't feel i would need it and also you do not want monsters in your grave flying maxx c- i never used flying maxx c because i only use it vs level 3 xyz decks such as Burning Abyss time space hole was in my side incase i was playing another xyz deck user or shaddoll deck and i figured 2 vs you was enough for me everything i sided i assumed was going to be scored not all my side deck cards thats why i used only some of them. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:51 pm | |
| B@TMAN, I understand but you should have added them then, right? If you would like a re-test, reach 100 posts and get the required DP, and you shall be good to go |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:05 pm | |
| Ebilkid I would like to point out Prohibition is a really great card...Lava golem is also interesting tech ESPECIALLY against Qliphort match up with apoqliphort tower. Time space trap hole is a very good card. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:46 am | |
| Welcome B@TMAN to JDDA!!And Jesse I like the idea of adding Lava Golem |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:49 am | |
| b@t, gravekeeper brown???? wtf. I'll pay for the retest myself e_e |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:10 am | |
| Botman should be in a higher dorm... |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:08 am | |
| We do not grade based off of how we think of someone, we grade based off of how well they do in a test, Ebil does not know him well thus making him the perfect tester against him, he was pushed to his limits, although with a little more work, he should rise up from the grave. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:21 am | |
| - supdesup wrote:
- Botman should be in a higher dorm...
I know very well that B@tman is one talented duelist and I know his skills and I expected from him at least close to Lightsworn. But had you watched our duels, you would have understood why I gave him thesemarks. However, it my havebeen my bad grading him so bad in theside. I had my mistake sin that and I must apologize. |
| | | *Judgment Dragon*
Posts : 224
Duel Points. : 9001
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-10-10
Age : 27
Location : Realm Of Light.
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:46 am | |
| I am aware people are unhappy with these results, and he can buy a re-test once he reaches 100 posts. It might seem hard, but it's not impossible and actually pretty easy. Now we have established this, then please let's drop any arguments and just appreciate we have B@TMAN here at the academy. :3 |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 6:22 am | |
| |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results Sun Nov 02, 2014 6:59 am | |
| - *Judgment Dragon* wrote:
- I am aware people are unhappy with these results, and he can buy a re-test once he reaches 100 posts. It might seem hard, but it's not impossible and actually pretty easy. Now we have established this, then please let's drop any arguments and just appreciate we have B@TMAN here at the academy. :3
well yeah cause i am B@TMAN |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: B@TMAN'S Test Results | |
| |
| | | |
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| Who is online? | In total there is 1 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest None Most users ever online was 260 on Fri Sep 17, 2021 11:26 pm |
Latest topics | » New Ally Inbound by Tsuko Aiko Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:33 pm
» Affiliation by Dark Angel Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:30 am
» Zippitty zee, what the fuck happened? by supdesup Thu Nov 27, 2014 5:59 am
» demarionebrown's test results by Guest Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:08 am
» Graphic work rewards! by Guest Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:37 am
» Sawada Tsuna's test results by Guest Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:55 am
» Heyy , just starting :D by Guest Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:39 pm
» Kiro15 test results by Guest Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:41 am
» Sawada's Entery by Guest Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:37 am
» JDDA Light vs Dark Tournament (sign ups closed) Rules! by Guest Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:47 pm
|
|